Wang et al. 2022 examined fossil bird pectorals in µCT

From the Wang et al. abstract:
“Here, the pectoral girdles of the Early Cretaceous birds Sapeornis and Piscivorenantiornis are reconstructed for the first time based on computed tomography and three-dimensional
visualization, revealing key morphological details that are important for our understanding of early-flight evolution. Our study reveals additional lineage-specific variations in pectoral girdle anatomy, as well as significant modification of the pectoral girdle along the line to crown birds.”

In case these birds are not familiar to you,
Sapeornis (Fig 2) nests with Archaeopteryx #11 basal to confusciusornithids in the large reptile tree (LRT, 2084 taxa). Piscivorenantiornis (Fig 3) nests between Sulcavis and Sinornis one clade over from the rest of the Enantiornithes in the LRT.

Figure 1. Figure from Wang et al. 2022. Animation and arrows added here. Note the elongation of the locked down coracoids, raising the shoulders above the midline. Microraptor is convergent with birds.
Figure 1a. Piscivorenantiornis from 1.18.22. Note the locked-down elongate coracoids, indicating a flapping capability.
Figure 2. Piscivorenantiornis from 1.18.22. Note the locked-down elongate coracoids, indicating a flapping capability.

Wang et al focused on the details
and overlooked the basics, the overall bauplan. In basal theropods, as in basal tetrapods, the short, round coracoids slid along the rims of the small sternum (Fig 1 top). In flapping taxa, like Microraptor and Columba (Fig 1) the coracoid stops sliding, is locked down and elongates raising the shoulders above the midline.

Figure 4. Sapeornis specimen STM 15-15 reconstructed from DGS tracing, figure 1 compared to a more robust specimen with larger feet but an identical humerus.
Figure 3. Sapeornis specimen STM 15-15 reconstructed from DGS tracing, figure 1 compared to a more robust specimen with larger feet but an identical humerus. Here the clavicles are shorter with rounder verntral margins, indicating a reduced flapping ability, despite the large wings.

This bauplan is repeated in pre-pterosaurs,
like Cosesaurus using the same elements by convergence.

Figure 1. Cosesaurus flapping - fast. There should be a difference in the two speeds. If not, apologies. Also, there should be some bounce in the tail and neck, but that would involve more effort and physics.
Figure 4. Cosesaurus flapping. Note the locked down elongate coracoids.

This flapping bauplan is also repeated in bats
using a locked down and elongate clavicle instead of a coracoid, missing mammals.

Figure 1. Ptilcercus (above) and Icaronycteris (below), sister taxa in the origin of bats.
Figure 5. Ptilcercus (above) and Icaronycteris (below). Note the ellongate clavicle in the bat, raising the shoulders to the dorsum.

Wang et al. make no mention
of nonvolant flapping. As everyone knows, most tetrapods, including gliding taxa, advance the forelimbs left-right-left-right. Flappers don’t. They flap symmetrically. Thus bipedalism is a precursor configuration required for flapping.

Are bats bipedal?
Yes, they are inverted bipeds, hanging by their toes.

References
Wang et al. 2022. Digital restoration of the pectoral girdles of two Early Cretaceous birds and implications for early-flight evolution. eLife 2022;0:e76086. DOI: https:// doi. org/ 10. 7554/ eLife. 76086.

2 thoughts on “Wang et al. 2022 examined fossil bird pectorals in µCT

  1. Just a quick note: not all bats are bipedal hangers! Some, such as Mystacina tuberculata and Desmodus rotundus, are fully capable of quadrupedal locomotion on land.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.