Modular (Mosaic) Evolution according to Wikipedia

The following is a direct lift from the Wiki article on Modular Evolution with critical comments added in red.

Redirected to:
Mosaic evolution (or modular evolution) is the concept that evolutionary change takes place in some body parts or systems without simultaneous changes in other parts.[1] Another definition is the “evolution of characters at various rates both within and between species”.[2]408 Its place in evolutionary theory comes under long-term trends or macroevolution.[2]

By its very nature, the evidence for this idea comes mainly from palaeontology. It is not claimed that this pattern is universal, but there is now a wide range of examples from many different taxa. Some examples:

Unfortunately this narrow and hopeful view ignores the fact that paleontologists can identify an australopithecine from its skull and teethvertebrae and other body parts. So, no modular evolution here. 

And yet paleontologists can identify Archaeopteryx by the pelvis, skull, tail, etc, whether wings or feathers are present or not. The differences are present, even if subtle. So, no modular evolution here. 

  • Meadow voles during the last 500,000 years.[6]

This example is reported  at the population level. Nothing here strong enough to differentiate one species from another. 

Unfortunately, Darwinopterus was not the transitional taxon between the long tails and short tails when you add more taxa to your analysis. Darwinopterus was an evolutionary dead end with no Cretaceous descendants. Sure it had a long skull and long neck, like pterodactyloids. But anurognathids had a short tail like pterodactyloids and only Andres thinks they were transitional. So, no modular evolution here. Convergence, yes!

Evolution from tiny four-toed pre-horses to large one-toed modern horses indeed took place over many millions of years. Certain traits occurred simultaneously. Others waited until later. So, no modular evolution here. 

Not sure what the reporter has in mind here, but certainly there were several clades that demonstrate convergence. Mammal experts are famous for being able to identify their specimens from a few teeth alone. So while other parts were evolving, so were the teeth. So, no modular evolution here. 

If anyone can provide an example of modular evolution in vertebrates, please bring it to the attention of the Wikipedia author of this article. If modular evolution were indeed present, paleontologists would be confounded by one end of the body not matching the other. Phylogenetic analysis usually takes care of all such problems.

And convergence is out there ready to trip you up if you’re not careful.