Pholidocercus: a long tailed armadillo-mimic hedgehog

Reversals in this taxon make it interesting.
Pholidocercus hassiacus (Fig. 1; von Koenigswald & Storch 1983; HLMD Me 7577; Middle Eocene) is a member of the rabbit/rodent/multituberculate clade Glires, but without the large anterior incisors that are found in most other members. This is a reversal hearkening back to basal placentals.

Figure 1. Only one of the several Messel Pit Pholidocercus specimens. This one has a truncated tail and a halo of soft tissue (pre-spines).

Figure 1. Only one of the several Messel Pit Pholidocercus specimens. This one has a truncated tail and a halo of soft tissue (pre-spines).

Three upper molars are present,
as in primates, and basal members of Glires, like Ptilocercus, the tree shrew. Other hedgehogs have only two upper molars.

Four upper premolars are present,
one more than in basal placentals and other hedgehogs.

Other hedgehogs have a stub for a tail.
Yet another reversal, Pholidocercus has a long, tail. It is bony and armored,  analogous to that of an armadillo (genus: Dasypus). Sister hedgehogs have just a stub for a tail. The curling of all hedgehogs for defense also recalls the spinal flexion of armadillos for defense. This is a trait basal therian mothers originally used to help guide their newborns from birth canal to teat.

Figure 2. Pholidocercus skull with DGS colors added. Distinct from most members of the Glires, the canine becomes more robust in the hedgehog clade. Note the posterior jaw joint, the opposite of mouse-like rodents.

Figure 2. Pholidocercus skull with DGS colors added. Distinct from most members of the Glires, the canine becomes more robust in the hedgehog clade. Note the posterior jaw joint, the opposite of mouse-like rodents. The short jugal is typical of this clade. No elongate dentary incisors here, yet another reversal to a basal placental condition.

Those sacral neural spines
(Fig. 1) are taller than in sister taxa. Armadillos also have tall sacral spines.

The clade Lipotyphyla, according to Wikipedia
“is a formerly used order of mammals, including the members of the order Eulipotyphla as well as two other families of the former order Insectivora, Chrysochloridae and Tenrecidae. However, molecular studies found the golden moles and tenrecs to be unrelated to the others.” 

The clade Eulipotyphyla, according to Wikipedia
“comprises the hedgehogs and gymnures (family Erinaceidae, formerly also the order Erinaceomorpha), solenodons (family Solenodontidae), the desmansmoles, and shrew-like moles (family Talpidae) and true shrews (family Soricidae).”

The clade Erinaceidae, according to Wikipedia
“Erinaceidae contains the well-known hedgehogs (subfamily Erinaceinae) of Eurasia and Africa and the gymnures or moonrats (subfamily Galericinae) of South-east Asia.”

The LRT largely confirms this clade,
but moles (genus: Talpa) nest separately in the clade Carnivora with the mongoose, Herpestes.

When you come across a taxon like Pholidocercus
first you eyeball it and declare it a… a… well, there are so many reversals here that it is best to avoid pulling a Larry Martin and just add it to a wide gamut phylogenetic analysis to let a large suite of traits decide for themselves based on maximum parsimony. Luckily the LRT had enough taxa to nest Pholidocercus with confidence with the hedgehogs, despite the several distinguishing traits and reversals.

Just added to the LRT:
Echinosorex, the extant moonrat. It also has a long tail and nests with Pholidocercus.

References
von Koenigswald W and Storch Gh 1983. Pholidocercus hassiacus, ein Amphilermuride aus dem Eozan der “Grube Messel” bei Darmstadt (Mammalia: Lipotyphla). Senchenberg Lethaia 64:447–459.

wiki/Hedgehogs
wiki/Erinaceus
wiki/Echinops
wiki/Pholidocercus

Advertisements

Evolution of multituberculates illustrated

Updated the next day, January 5, 2019 with new interpretations of the post-dentary bones in figure 3, detailed here.

With the addition of four taxa
to the large reptile tree (LRT, 1370 taxa), a review of the Bremer scores helped cement relationships in the Primates + Glires clade (Figs. 1, 2). Yesterday we looked at plesiadapiform taxa (within Glires, Fig. 2) leading to the aye-aye, Daubentonia. Today we’ll look at a sister clade within Glires, one that produced the clade Multituberculata.

The traditional, but invalid outgroup taxon,
Haramiyavia, is a pre-mammal trithelodontid not related to the rodent-and plesiadapiform- related members of the Multituberculata in the LRT. More on that hypothesis below.

In Figure 1
look for the gradual accumulation of traits in derived taxa. Carpolestes (Late Paleocene) is a late survivor from a Jurassic radiation. Paulchoffatia is Latest Jurassic. Megaconus is Middle Jurassic. Vilevolodon, Xianshou and Rugosodon are Late Jurassic. Kryptobaatar is Late Cretaceous. Ptilodus is Paleocene. So this radiation had its genesis in the Early Jurassic and some clades, like Carpolestes, had late survivors.

Figure 1. LRT taxa in the lineage of multituberculates arising from Carpolestes and Paulchoffatia.

Figure 1. LRT taxa in the lineage of multituberculates arising from Carpolestes and Paulchoffatia. Carpolestes is a sister to Ignacius. The new taxon, Arboroharamiya, nests with Xianshou in the Han et al. cladogram.

It’s worth noting
that the one key trait that highlights many multituberculates, the oddly enlarged last premolar of the dentary, is also a trait found in the basal taxon, Carpolestes, but not in Paulchoffatia, (Fig. 1). Paulchoffatia has the odd mandible (dentary) without a distinct retroarticular process common to multituberculates, convergent with Daubentonia. That there is also no distinct glenoid process (jaw joint) in clade members made these jaw bones even harder to understand. Then I realized the jaw joints were mobile, slung in place by muscles, as in rodents and primates, rather than a cylindrical dentary/squamosal joint, as in Carnivorans.

There is one more elephant in the room
that needs to be discussed. Earlier we looked at the splints of bone at the back of the jaws in multituberculates identified as posterior jaw bones (Fig. 3), a traditional pre-mammal trait. Multis move the squamosal to the back of the skull and reduce the ear bone coverings (ectotympanics) that nearly all other placentals use to cover the middle ear bones. This reversal to the pre-mammal condition is key to the traditional hypothesis shared by all mammal experts that multis are pre-mammals. Embryo primitive therians have posterior jaw bones, but these turn into tiny middle ear bones during ontogeny. In multis their retention in adults is yet another example of neotony.

Why lose/reverse those excellent placental middle ear bones?
‘Why’ questions get into the realm of speculation. With that proviso, here we go.

Figure 2. Jaw muscles of the Late Cretaceous multituberculate, Catopsbaatar.

Figure 2. Jaw muscles of the Late Cretaceous multituberculate, Catopsbaatar.

The over-development of the lower last premolar
indicates some sort of preference or adaptation for food requiring such a tooth. The coincident and neotonous migration of the squamosals to the back of the skull (the pre-mammal Sinoconodon condition) enlarged the temporal chewing muscles (Fig. 2). The neotonous lack of development of tiny middle ear bones was tied in to that posterior migration. Evidently Jurassic and Cretaceous arboreal multis did not need the hearing capabilities provided by the tiny middle ear bones of most therians, but they needed larger jaw muscles. Evidently they were safe in the trees because there were few to no arboreal predators of mammals back then. Multis and rodents had the trees to themselves. Evidently that changed in the Tertiary, when multis became extinct, perhaps because birds of prey (hawks and owls) became widespread and only rodents could hear them coming. That’s a lot of guesswork. Confirmation or refutation should follow.

Figure 3. Images from Han et al. Color and white labels added. Here the malleus, incus and stapes have reverted to their pre-mammal states and configurations. Note the quadrate is in contact with the articular, as in pre-mammals as the dentary and squamosal become a sliding joint, carried by larger jaw muscles. Also note the various ectotympanic bones (yellow) also present, typical of Theria.

Figure 3. Images from Han et al. Color and white labels added. Here the malleus, incus and stapes have reverted to their pre-mammal states and configurations. Note the quadrate is in contact with the articular, as in pre-mammals as the dentary and squamosal become a sliding joint, carried by larger jaw muscles. Also note the various ectotympanic bones (yellow) also present, typical of Theria.

A recent paper by Han et al. 2017
on the Late Jurassic pre-mulltituberculate euharamiyidan, Arboroharamiya (Fig. 3), documents precisely the status of the middle ear/posteror jaw bones along with the phylogenetic reduction of the ectotympanic that frames the ear drum and forms a thin shell around the middle ear bones in more primitive members of the clade Glires (Fig. 4, evidently there is more variation in this, and I will take a look at that in the future). Han et al. report for Arboroharamiya, “The lower jaws are in an occlusal position and the auditory bones are fully separated from the dentary.” That is the mammal condition.

The Han et al cladograms
include a rabbit and a rodent, but suffer from massive taxon exclusion. As a result they mix up prototherians, metatherians and eutherians as if shuffling a deck of cards, as compared to the LRT. My first impression is that they use too many taxa known only form dental traits when they should have deleted those until a robust tree topology was created and established with a large suite of traits from more complete taxa, as in the LRT.  I will add Arboroharamiya to the LRT shortly.

Figure 2b. Subset of the LRT focusing on Primates + Glires.

Figure 4. Subset of the LRT focusing on Primates + Glires.

Unfortunately,
and I hate to report this, mammal experts have been guilty of depending on a short or long list of traits (which can and often do converge and reverse) to identify taxa and clades. As readers know, paleontologists should only depend on a phenomic phylogenetic analysis that tests a large suite of bone characters and a wide gamut of taxa. Analysis proves time and again to be the only way to confidently identify taxa and lump’n’split clades. Cladograms, when done correctly, weed out convergence. Otherwise, reversals, like the neotonous reappearance of post-dentary bones and the reotonous disappearance of ectotympanics, can be troublesome to deal with, causing massive confusion. A phylogenetic analysis quickly and confidently identifies reversals because all possible candidates are tested at one time. 

Unfortunately,
d
iscovering this little insight is yet another reason why other workers have dismissed the LRT, have attempted to discredit the LRT, and is causing confusion in yet another upcoming class of future paleontologists. Paleo students have to choose between relying on a short list of traits or performing a phenomic phylogenetic analysis. Only the latter actually works (see below) and avoids mixing in convergent traits.

If you don’t remember
‘amphibian-like reptiles,’ those are taxa, like Gephyrostegus, Eldeceeon and Silvanerpeton, that nest at the base of all reptiles in the LRT, but have no traditional reptile traits. Everyone else considers them anamniotes. In the LRT, based solely on their last common ancestor status/nesting, these taxa are known to have evolved the amniotic membrane, the one trait, by definition, that unites all reptiles (including birds and mammals) and labels the above basal taxa, ‘amphibian-lke reptiles.’

References
Han G, Mao F-Y, Bi-SD, Wang Y-Q and Meng J 2017. A Jurassic gliding euharamiyidan mammal with an ear of five auditory bones. Nature 551:451–457.
Urban et al. (6 co-authors) 2017. A new developmental mechanism for the separation of the mammalian middle ear ossicles from the jaw. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2416

Basal placentals illustrated in phylogenetic order

Eutherian (= placental) mammals
are divided into clades like Primates, Ungulata, Carnivora, etc. Known basal taxa for each of these clades are related to one another in a ladder-like fashion, each one nesting at the base of a bushy clade in the large reptile tree (LRT, 1366 taxa).

Today,
an illustration of skeletons (Fig. 1) and skulls (Fig. 2) in phylogenetic order documents the minor changes (microevolution) between basal taxa that nest at the bases of several increasingly derived placental clades.

FIgure 1. Skeletons of taxa that nest at the bases of several major placental clades, divided between Cretaceous and Paleocene taxa.

FIgure 1. Skeletons of taxa that nest at the bases of several major placental clades, divided between Cretaceous and Paleocene taxa, divided by four different scales. Basal taxa are several degrees of magnitude smaller.

The following placental skulls are not to scale
yet continue to demonstrate the minor changes (microevolution) that occur at the bases of several major placental clades. For instance, Chriacus is basal to bats, while Maelestes is basal to odontocete whales. It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine such future developments in these basal taxa without the benefit of a wide gamut analysis, like the LRT.

Figure 2. A selection of placental skulls in phylogenetic order and divided into Cretaceous and Paleocene taxa.

Figure 2. A selection of placental skulls in phylogenetic order and divided into Cretaceous and Paleocene taxa.

The lesson for today:
Sometimes quantity, without firsthand observation, is needed to put together the ‘Big Picture’ before one is able to pick apart the details that each specific specimen reveals during firsthand study. Traditionally paleontologists have been putting the latter ahead of the former by (too often) excluding pertinent taxa revealed and documented by the more generalized and wide gamut phylogenetic analysis provided by the LRT. Like Yin and Yang, both must be considered. ‘Avoid taxon omission‘ is the single most important rule when constructing a cladogram of interrelationships.

References
See ReptileEvolution.com and links therein.

‘Taeniodonta’ is polyphyletic, part 4: Ectoganus, Stylinodon and Psittacotherium

These three bear-sized aquatic wolverines,
Ectoganus (Fig. 5), Stylinodon (Fig. 1) and Psittacotherium (Fig. 2), are traditional members of the invalidated polyphyletic (Fig. 3) clade ‘Taeniodonta’. We looked at other nestings for former taeniodonts earlier here, here and here. The large reptile tree (LRT, 1365 taxa) recently nested fanged Machaeroides basal to these taxa, rather than with its traditional marsupial sister, Oxyaena. Taxon exclusion kept the real sisters apart until now.

Figure 1. Stylinodon skull. Note the transverse premaxilla, a trait of the Carnivora.

Figure 1. Stylinodon skull. Note the transverse premaxilla, a trait of the Carnivora.

Stylinodon mirus (Marsh 1874; middle Eocene, 45 mya) was originally considered a taeniodont, perhaps derived from the basal phenacodont, Onychodectes. Here it nests within Carnivora in the clade of Mustela the living mink, Gulo the living wolverine and Ursus the living polar bear. The largest anterior teeth are canines. The peg-like molars also continued growing throughout life. There were twice as many molars (4), each with a single root, as in the two double rooted molars of the mink. The teeth continued growing throughout life, as in edentates like Glyptodon. Large claws indicate that digging remained part of its lifestyle.

Figure 7. Psittacotherium in various views.

Figure 7. Psittacotherium in various views.

Psittacotherium multifragum (Cope 1862; Paleocene, 60mya; 1.1m length) is a related taxon with canine teeth transformed into a parrot-like rostrum. Wortman 1896 considered it a type of ground sloth and a member of the Edentata (= Xenarthra).

Figure 3. Subset of the LRT labeling several traditional taeniodonts in red, indicating the traditional clade Taeniodonta is polyphyletic and should therefore be abandoned.

Figure 3. Subset of the LRT labeling several traditional taeniodonts in red, indicating the traditional clade Taeniodonta is polyphyletic and should therefore be abandoned.

Ectoganus copei (Schoch 1981; USNM 12714; early Eocene) is a sister to Stylinodon with a longer, lower skull, two upper incisors and a kinked maxilla.

Figure 5. Ectoganus nests with Stylinodon and Psittacotherium within the Carnivora, derived from Gulo, the wolverine.

Figure 5. Ectoganus nests with Stylinodon and Psittacotherium within the Carnivora, derived from Gulo, the wolverine.

Even as recently as 2013, Williamson and Brusatte
supported the traditional clade ‘Taeniodonta’, but only by the ‘authority’  of untested tradition (they employed the dataset and analysis of Rook and Hunter 2013).

Here we test from a wide gamut of taxa,
which minimizes the possibility of taxon exclusion. There’s no need to repeat a rumor, tradition or paradigm without a thorough testing in the LRT. The big picture is missing in traditional paleontology. That’s what the LRT is here for.

Again, this is low hanging fruit,
ignored by traditional paleontologists due to the easy sin of omission: taxon exclusion.

References
Cope ED 1882. A new genus of Tillodonta. The American Naturalist, 16: 156–157.
Rook DL and Hunter JP 2013. Rooting around the eutherian family tree: the origin and relations of the Taeniodonta. Journal of Mammal Evolution
DOI 10.1007/s10914-013-9230-9
Schoch RM 1983. Systematics, functional morphology and macroevolution of the extinct mammalian order Taeniodonta. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin 42: 307pp. 60 figs. 65 pls.
Williamson TE and Brusatte SL 2013. New specimens of the rare Taeniodont Wortmania (Mammalia: Eutheria) from the San Juan Basin of New Mexico and Comments on the Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of “Archaic” Mammals. PLoS ONE 8(9): e75886. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075886
Wortman JL 1896. Psittacotherium, a member of a new and primitive suborder of the Edentata. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 8(16):259–262.

wiki/Psittacotherium

 

 

The extant pika has a Late Jurassic sister: Henkelotherium

We’ve known
since 2016 that the tiny Late Jurassic mammal, Henkelotherium is a basal rabbit (contra traditional studies that exclude rabbits). Today the extant pika (genus: Ochotona, Figs. 1, 2) enters the large reptile tree (LRT, 1348 taxa).

Figure 1. Pika skull (genus: Ochotona) in three views.

Figure 1. Pika skull (genus: Ochotona) in three views. It’s cuter with a coat of fur (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Pika is a basal rabbit that prefers mountainous terrain. A sister, Henkelotherium, goes back to the Late Jurassic.

Figure 2. Pika is a basal rabbit that prefers mountainous terrain. A sister, Henkelotherium, goes back to the Late Jurassic.

Ochotona princeps (originally Lepus dauuricus Pallas, 1776; Link 1795; Richardson 1828) is the extant pika, a rock-dwelling herbivore nesting between Henkelotherium and rabbits. Pikas live in mountainous areas in Asia and North America. Distinct from Henkelotherium, Ochotona is larger, with a near complete loss of the tail. Both have spreading metatarsals and four upper molars. In pikas the second incisors are posteromedial to the first incisors, creating a larger cheek area. A medial pedal digit 1 is present in both.

Fossil pikas are known from the Miocene, 16mya, to the recent, but Henkelotherium goes back to the Late Jurassic.

Figure 2. Henkelotherium reconstructed from DGS tracings in figure 1. Note the tiny manus and large pes, traits that continue into extant rabbits.

Figure 3. Henkelotherium reconstructed from DGS tracings in figure 1. Note the tiny manus and large pes, traits that continue into extant rabbits. The image is 75% larger than life size.

Figure 4. Subset of the LRT featuring Ochotona and the rabbits.

Figure 4. Subset of the LRT featuring Ochotona and the rabbits.

Henkelotherium guimarotae (Krebs 1991; Late Jurassic 150 mya, Fig. 3) was traditionally considered eupantothere. Henkelotherium nests within the rabbit clade as a very early member of the tree shrew/ shrew/ rodent/ rabbit clade: Glires. Like its sisters, the manus was small and the pes had long digits with sharp claws. The lumbar region was long and flexible, ideal for hopping and galloping. Note the long robust tail.

This new nesting further confirms
the hypothesis that rodents (including multituberculates) and rabbits (including Henkeleotherium) had a deep Mesozoic origin (Fig. 5).

Figure 1. Select basal cynodonts and mammals set chronologically. The divergence times for placentals (Eutheria), marsupials (Metatheria) and monotremes (Mammalia) are estimated here.

Figure 5. Select basal cynodonts and mammals set chronologically. The divergence times for placentals (Eutheria), marsupials (Metatheria) and monotremes (Mammalia) are estimated here.

References
Link HF 1795.  Über die Lebenskräfte in naturhistorischer Rücksicht und die Classification der Säugthiere. – Beyträge zur Naturgeschichte (Rostock, Leipzig) 2: 1-41.
Kear BP, Cooke BN, Archer M and Flannery TF 2007. Implications of a new species of the Oligo-Miocene kangaroo (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea) Nambaroo, from the Riversleigh World Heritage Area, Queensland, Australia, in Journal of Paleontology 81:1147-1167.
Krebs B 1991. Skelett von Henkelotherium guimarotae gen. et sp. nov. (Eupantotheria, Mammalia) aus dem Oberen Jura von Portugal. Berl Geowiss Abh A.: 133:1–110.

wiki/Pika
wiki/Henkelotherium

 

False positives in an LRT subset lacking fossil taxa

I think you’ll find this phylogenetic experiment both
gut-wrenching and extremely illuminating. While reading this, keep in mind the importance of having/recovering the correct outgroup for every clade and every node. That can only be ascertained by including a wide gamut of taxa—including fossils. Adding taxa brings you closer and closer to echoing actual events in deep time while minimizing the negative effects of not including relevant/pertinent taxa.

Today you’ll see
what excluding fossil taxa (Fig. 1) will do to an established nearly fully resolved cladogram, the large reptile tree (LRT, 1318 taxa). Earlier we’ve subdivided the LRT before, when there were fewer taxa in total. Here we delete all fossil taxa (except Gephyrostegus, a basal amniote used to anchor the cladogram because PAUP designates the first taxon the outgroup).

PAUP recovers 250+ trees
on 264 (~20%) undeleted extant taxa.

  1. Overall lepidosaurs, turtles, birds and mammals nest within their respective clades.
  2. Overall lepidosaurs nest with archosaurs and turtles with mammals, contra the LRT, which splits turtles + lepidosaurs and mammals + archosaurs as a basal amniote dichotomy.
  3. Overall mammals are not the first clade to split from the others, contra traditional studies. All pre-mammal amniotes in the LRT are extinct.
  4. Within lepidosaurs, the highly derived horned lizards and chameleons are basal taxa, contra the LRT, which nests Iguana as a basal squamate.
  5. Within lepidosaurs, geckos no longer nest with snakes, contra the LRT.
  6. Crocodiles nest with kiwis, as in the LRT, but it is still amazing that PAUP recovered this over such a large phylogenetic distance.
  7. Within aves, so few taxa are fossils in the LRT that the tree topology is very close to the original.
  8. Within mammals marsupials no longer nest between monotremes and placentals
  9. …and because of this carnivores split off next.
  10. Contra the LRT, hippos are derived from the cat and dog clade, all derived from weasels.
  11. Within mammals odontocetes no longer nest with tenrecs.
  12. Within mammals mysticetes nest with odontocetes, no longer nest with hippos.
  13. Contra the LRT, whales are derived from manatees and elephants.
Figure 1. Subset of the LRT focusing on Amniota (=Reptilia) with all fossil taxa deleted. Gephyrostegus, a Westphalian fossil is included as the outgroup.

Figure 1. Subset of the LRT focusing on Amniota (=Reptilia) with all fossil taxa deleted. Gephyrostegus, a Westphalian fossil is included as the outgroup.

BTW,
here are the results based on using the basal fish, Cheirolepis, as an outgroup:

    1. The caecilian, Dermophis, nests as the basalmost tetrapod.
    2. Followed by the frog and salamander.
    3. Squamates branch off next with legless lizards and burrowing snakes at a basalmost node. Terrestrial snakes are derived from burrowing snakes. Gekkos split next followed by varanids and skinks. Another clade begins with the tegu and Lacerta, followed by iguanids. Sphenodon nests between the horned lizards, Moloch and Phyrnosoma + the chameleon.
    4. Turtles split off next with the soft-shell turtle, Trionyx, at the base.
    5. One clade of mammals split off next with echidnas first, then elephant shrews and tenrecs, followed by a clade including the pangolin, seals and other basal carnivores. Cats and dogs split off next followed by hippos, then artiodactyls, perissodactyls, the hyrax, elephants, manatees, mysticetes and odontocetes.
    6. Another clade of mammals include edentates, followed by tree shrews and glires, followed by (colugos + bats) + primates, followed by another clade of basal carnivores, followed by marsupials.
    7. The final clade is Crocodylus + extant birds, which are not well resolved and split apart into two major clades with some subclades maintaining their topology while other clades split apart. So the archosaurs nest together.

This test emphasizes the need for the inclusion of fossil taxa in order to recover a gradual accumulation of traits at all nodes, which takes us closer to actual evolutionary patterns in deep time.

The short-faced bear (Arctodus) is a giant wolverine in the LRT.

Yesterday we looked at three bears, Ursus, Arctodus (Fig. 1) and Ailuropoda (the polar bear, the short-faced bear and the panda bear). They do not form a single bear clade in the large reptile tree (LRT, 1299 taxa), but each is more closely related to small weasels and grew to bear-size by convergence.

For instance,
Arctodus is most closely related to today’s wolverine (Gulo gulo, Figs. 1, 2) among tested taxa, and the similarities are immediately apparent. Have they ever been tested together before? Let me know if this is so.

Figure 1. Arctodus (shor-faced bear) skeleton compared to the smaller Gulo (wolverine) skeleton. Both have similar proportions. Arctodus is larger than 3m, while Gulo is about 1m in length.

Figure 1. Arctodus (shor-faced bear) skeleton compared to the smaller Gulo (wolverine) skeleton. Both have similar proportions. Arctodus is larger than 3m, while Gulo is about 1m in length.

Arctodus simus (Leidy 1854; Cope 1874; up to 3 to 3.7m tall) is the extinct short-faced bear, one of the largest terrestrial mammalian carnivores of all time. Long limbs made it a fast predator. Being related to the wolverine made it short-tempered and dangerous.

Figure 2. Long-legged Gulo, the wolverine, is most similar to Arctodus, the short-faced bear in the LRT.

Figure 2. Long-legged Gulo, the wolverine, is most similar to Arctodus, the short-faced bear in the LRT. That’s a penile bone, not a prepubis.

Gulo gulo (Linneaus 1758; up to 110 cm in length) is the extant wolverine, a ferocious predator resembling a small bear. Note the tail length is midway between the long tail of weasels and the short tail of birds.

Figure 1. Subset of the LRT focusing on the Carnivora with tan tones on the bears newly added.

Figure 3. Subset of the LRT focusing on the Carnivora with tan tones on the bears newly added.

The red panda
(Ailurus) was also added to the LRT (Fig. 3) and, to no one’s surprise, nests with the raccoon, Procyon apart from the giant panda.

Figure 4. Gulo skull in lateral and dorsal views. Compare to Arctodus in figure 5.

Figure 4. Gulo skull in lateral and dorsal views. Compare to Arctodus in figure 5. The male skull has the larger and longer parasagittal crest.

The skulls of Gulo and Arctodus
(Figs. 4, 5) despite their size differences, are quite similar. Both display sexual dimorphism.

Figure 5. Arctodus (short-faced bear) skull in lateral view. Compare to figure 4.

Figure 5. Arctodus (short-faced bear) skull in lateral view. Compare to figure 4.

Taxon inclusion
sheds light on phylogenetic interrelationships.

If you have an interest in wolverine evolution,
I suggest you use the keyword “Gulo” or you’ll end up learning about Marvel’s superhero, also named Wolverine.

References
Cope ED 1879. The cave bear of California. American Naturalist 13:791.
Leidy 1854. Remarks on Sus americanus or Harlanus americanus, and on other extinct mammals. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 7:90.
Linnaeus C 1758. Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata.

wiki/Gulo
wiki/Short-faced_bear