and the two previous ones here and here were prompted by a YouTube video on Bear-dogs. Today we’ll talk about bears and their place in the cladogram of the Carnivora. Turns out they are not related to dogs (contra Matthews 1930, Wang 1994), so there should be no such thing as a bear-dog (contra Tomiya and Tseng 2016). Taxon exclusion, as usual, is the problem with these earlier, more focused studies.
DNA has it backwards.
Flynn et al. 2005 recovered extant Carnivora relationships, but nested cats and dogs at the base of the clade (Fig. 2). Count the toes. Basal taxa, like weasels, have five toes in contact with the substrate. And which taxa look most like the outgroup arboreal didelphids? Civets and weasels. And where are the civets? They were not included. Ironically, this is an example of DNA matching trait analysis, except Flynn et al. reversed the order, had the cladogram upside-down. Of course, the lack of fossils obscures more precise relationships and omits many key extinct taxa. We looked at problems with DNA cladograms here, here and here.
the large reptile tree (LRT, 1278 taxa; subset Fig. 3) nest cats and dogs as the most highly derived members of the Carnivora. They only have four toes in contact with the substrate and they look different than outgroup didelphids. And they are highly arboreal. Civets (genus: Nandinia) and vulpavids (genus: Vulpavus) nest at the base of the Carnivora in the LRT (Fig. 3). Civet-like arboreal didelphids (genus: Caluromys) are outgroups.
like Ursus maritimus (= polar bear; Fig. 4) nest between the weasels (genera: Mustela and Puijila) and the giant weasels (genus: Stylinodon) with teeth that continued growing throughout its lifetime and giant canines that came to resemble rodent-like incisors. The aquatic forms, Palaeonsinopa and seals like Phoca are bear cousins.
(Rybczynski et al., 2009) was originally considered “a walking seal”, but here links weasels to bears and weasels to seals (but not sea lions, contra Rybczynski et al., 2009, because the Pinnipedia is diphyletic).
(Don’t trust teeth alone because they change with diet. Always score traits for the entire skull and body whenever possible to get the closest possible relatives from a long list of candidates).
Let’s talk about the traditional origin of bears.
There is a mink-sized early Oligocene taxon known from the front half of a skull, Amphicynodon (Fig. 5; Wang , McKenna and Dashzeveg 2005) that has been the traditional ancestor of bears. In the LRT Amphicynodon nests close to bears, but closer to Stylinodon and Psittacotherium, taxa never tested with Amphicynodon before.
Flynn JJ, Finarelli JA, Zehr S, Hsu J and Nedbal MA 2005. Molecular phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): Assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships. Systematic Biology. 54 (2): 317–37.
Matthew WD 1930. The Phylogeny of Dogs, Journal of Mammalogy 11(2):117–138,
Rybczynski N, Dawson MR and Tedford RH 2009. A semi-aquatic Arctic mammalian carnivore from the Miocene epoch and origin of Pinnipedia. Nature. 458 (7241): 1021–24.
Wang X 1994. Phylogenetic systematics of the Hesperocynoninae (Carnivora: Canidae). Bulletion of the American Museum of Natural History 221: xx pp. PDF
Wang X, McKenna MC and Dashzeveg D 2005. Amphicticeps and Amphicynodon
(Arctoidea, Carnivora) from Hsanda Gol Formation, Central Mongolia and Phylogeny of
Basal Arctoids with Comments on Zoogeography. American Museum Novitates 3483:17pp.
Wang X and Tedford RH 2008. How dogs came to run the world. Natural History 117(6):18–23.