Volaticotherium antiquus (Meng et al. 2006; ?Middle Jurassic to ?Earliest Cretaceous, 164 mya; 3 cm skull length; IVPP V14739; Figs. 1-3) was described a few years back as a gliding mammal, based on a preserved patagium, or gliding membrane, complete with short hair and skin. Oddly, the patagium was preserved, but not the basic skin and fu, usually preserved as a halo around the skeleton. Hmmm.
the skin has slipped off the scattered roadkill skeletal elements like a bath towel (Fig. 2) leaving some doubt as to where it connected to the body and limbs. If a patagium, its symmetrical counterpart, if present, is not preserved and the skin itself seems to be fully stretched out, at odds with patagia of other flying and gliding animals, that tend to shrink went not in use. Interesting, perhaps, that the patagial outline roughly corresponds to what the basic skin of Volaticotherium would have to be. No such skin was mentioned in the text or is visible in the fossil as a halo or scattering of fur. Sister taxa, such as Monodelphis (Fig. 5), do not have a bushy tail, as illustrated above (Fig.1).
Did female Volaticotherium glide
with exposed underdeveloped young attached only by jaws on nipples? I think the danger involved argues against that behavior, at least while suckling. Bats leave their young at the roost while feeding, until they are hold enough to cling well and they have one pup at a time. Colugos likewise have a single pup at a time. See image here. Wikipedia reports, “Colugos raise their young in a similar fashion to marsupials. Newborn colugos are underdeveloped and weigh only 35 g (1.2 oz). They spend the first six months of life clinging to their mother’s belly. The mother colugo curls her tail and folds her patagium into a warm, secure, quasi-pouch in order to protect and transport her young.”
There’s much more to this extraordinary mammal that is not controversial.
The molars resemble rotary saw blades, the external naris is divided by an ascending process of the premaxilla (rare among higher cynodonts and mammals), proximally the femur has no ‘neck’ and not much of a ‘head’, and the tail is extraordinarily long. Not listed by Meng et al., The mandible is not gently convex, as in Monodelphis and most other basal and stem mammals, but is sharply convex ventral to the canines, then gently concave, a shape not otherwise seen until higher primates. We also see a deeper mandible medial to sabertooth fangs in Thylacosmilus, and this may be the reason for the oddly deeper chin here.
Volaticotherium was deemed so different
from all other known mammals that it was given its own order, the Volaticotheria, nesting between basalmost mammals (Proteutherians) and Therians. That new order appears to be appropriate.
in the large reptile tree, despite its many autapomorphies and convergent traits, Volaticotherium nested with the basalmost placental, Monodelphis domesticus (Fig. 3), which is appropriate, given its Late Jurassic age. The two were roughly comparable in size. Note, both cladograms nested Volaticotherium at about the same node (within a branch or two) given widely different taxon lists.
The femoral head
of Volaticotherium was about as shallow as it could be and evidently not due to crushing. Generally a spherical femoral head provides strength and maneuverability. Monodelphis has a spherical femoral head. Cartilaginous or connective tissue may have substituted for bone in Volaticotherium. I can’t think of any appropriate analogies elsewhere among tested taxa for what such a femur would allow or disallow.
Other arboreal features
As in Monodelphis, the hallux (big toe) diverged from the other metatarsals at 35º angle, flexor sesamoids and curved phalanges with small sharp claws indicate an arboreal niche for Volaticotherium. The limbs were all described as elongated, but only the forelimb appears elongated relative to the femur (Fig. 3) and relative to the limbs of Monodelphis. The distal phalanges would appear to be fully flexed, tucked beneath the proximal phalanges, but the X-ray does not reveal them. The long tail was likely used in balancing and leaping, like a lemur. The cervicals were very short, as in the basal primate, Notharctus, and in Longisquama, a lemur-like lepidosaur. The scapula was relatively small, as in Notharctus and Longisquama. The calcaneum was relatively short and flexible, enabling rotation of the foot for better grasping of tree trunks while heading in any direction.
Some differences in interpretation
I could be wrong here, but the oddly procumbent molar cusps that Meng et al nested in the mandible appear to be dislocated from the maxilla instead. I found one of the pelves.
There is another Jurassic sister taxon out there:
Argentoconodon (Gaetano and Rogier 2011; Fig. 6), known from teeth and scattered jaw fragments. Like Volaticotherium, the molar cusps are aligned as in pre-mammalian triconodonts. Unlike Volaticotherium, the medial incisor is the size of a canine, which appears suspect.
The holotype genus
for the triconodonts, Triconodon, provides evidence for the replacement of its lower fourth premolar, erupting and coming into use when at least three out of its four molars were already fully erupted, which is a mammal trait. Note the very low jaw articulation and sub canine ‘chin’, traits shared with Volaticotherium.
Perhaps this triconodont clade
evolved a simplified, more primitive-type tooth with aligned cusps. If so, it’s not alone. Toothed cetaceans, for instance, have only simple conical teeth.
I thank Dr. Meng
for sending me a pdf of his paper describing an important early arboreal mammal. I have an inquiry for him, still awaiting a reply, wondering if the simplified (primitive) molar structure of Volaticotherium, might be a derived reversal.
Docofossor, a coeval Jurassic digging mammal and part of the same truncated clade as the arboreal Volaticotherium (Fig. 4).
Gaetano GW and Rougier GW 2011. New materials of Argentoconodon fariasorum (Mammaliaformes, Triconodontidae) from the Jurassic of Argentina and its bearing on triconodont phylogeny. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31(4):829-843.
Meng J, Hu YM, Wang YQ, Wang XL and Li CK 2006. A Mesozoic gliding mammal from northeastern China. Nature 444:889-893.