The orientation of the pubis
in certain, otherwise bird-like, tiny theropods, the Scanoriopterygidae, has been an ongoing problem. Today we solve that problem without looking at the specimens firsthand.
(Czerkas and Yuan 2002, CAGS02-IG-gausa-1/DM 607) is a small basal bird (as recovered by the large reptile tree). It has a bird-like pelvis, but this has not been recognized by other paleontologists who identified the displaced ischium as the pubis and the pubis as the ischium. That made it appear that the pubis did not point posteriorly, as it does in all birds and related taxa. A reinterpretation of the pelvis is shown here (Fig. 2). The pubis is still in contact with the appropriate area of the ilium, forming the anterior acetabulum. Only the ischia have been displaced — in two different directions.
So there you are. Problem solved.
But wait… there’s another example of a sister taxon with a similar problem!
Epidexipteryx has a similar problem in its pelvis
Another scanoriopterygid, Epidexipteryx (Zhang et al. 2008, Figs. 3, 4, IVPP V 15471) also has a mistakenly identified pubis and ischium. Ironic and odd, but true. This anurognathid-like basal bird has the largest teeth relative to its skull of any bird. Zhang et al. thought Epidexipteryx was a bizarre maniraptoran nesting just basal to birds
When you put the corrected pelvis
and manus on a reconstruction of Epidexipteryx hui (Fig. 4), you get a very basal bird, according to the large reptile tree (Fig 2). Note: nowhere in these sister taxa do you get any hint of a novel forelimb bone as imagined for Yi qi (Xu et al. 2015),but falsified here.
It is indeed odd
that taphonomy would randomly shift a bone over just enough in two related taxa to make it appear that a pubis was actually an ischium. Or that a giant finger would be placed to resemble a pubis. Or that two ischia would look like feathers.
That’s why it is so important
to test autapomorphies, to look more closely at problems and make comparisons to sister taxa. When you do, many autapomorphes will reveal themselves to be misidentified plesiomorphies, as we’ve seen here, here and here. However, the long third finger on both of these taxa distinguishes them from all other theropods.
Epidendorsaurus ningchengensis (IVPP V12653) appears to be conspecific with Scanoriopteryx.
The appearance of these Middle to Late Jurassic taxa
earlier than their Late Jurassic ‘ancestors’ among the several specimens labeled Archaeopteryx, indicates that Archaeopteryx and the birds had earlier origins
Czerkas SA and Yuan C 2002. An arboreal maniraptoran from northeast China. Pp. 63-95 in Czerkas, S.J. (Ed.), Feathered Dinosaurs and the Origin of Flight. The Dinosaur Museum Journal 1. The Dinosaur Museum, Blanding, U.S.A.
Xu X, Zheng X-T, Sullivan C, Wang X-L, Xing l, Wang Y, Zhang X-M, O’Connor JK, Zhang F-C and Pan Y-H 2015. A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran theropod with preserved evidence of membranous wings.Nature (advance online publication)
Zhang F, Zhou Z-H, Xu X, Wang X and Sullivan C 2008. A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran from China with elongate ribbon-like feathers. Nature 455 doi:10.1038:1105-1108.