Updated Feb 8, 2016 with a new nesting for this taxon, away from Herrerasaurus and towards a newly added taxon, Eodromaeus.
According to Wikipedia
“Barberenasuchus brasiliensis (Mattar 1987; Fig. 1) is an extinct genus of an archosauriform. Fossils (poorly preserved skull and axis vertebra) have been found from the Santa Maria Formation of southern Brazil of Late Triassic age. Its phylogenetic position within Archosauriformes is uncertain; the author of its description classified it as a sphenosuchid crocodylomorph, while Kischlat (2000) considered it to be a rauisuchian. Irmis, Nesbitt and Sues (2013) stated that they “could not find any crocodylomorph character states preserved in the holotype specimen”. Based on the presence of an antorbital fenestra the [latter] authors assigned Barberenasuchus to Archosauriformes, but stated that without further preparation and study it is not possible to assign it to any specific archosauriform group.”
In phylogenetic analysis
the line drawing (from Riff et al. 2012) nests Barberenasuchus with the protodinosaurs Junggarsuchus, Pseudhesperosuchus and Carnufex in the large reptile tree. Tradtiional paleontologists consider these sphenosuchid basal crocs. So did Riff et al.
It’s pretty obvious at first glance, isn’t it? The odd sort of postorbital that rises in a dorsal arc lateral to a crested parietal is a dead giveaway for this clade. No other reptiles have it. Compare this drawing of Barberenasuchus to Pseudhesperosuchus here.
the line drawing does not do justice to a jpeg of the fossil itself (Fig.2, courtesy of D. Riff). That ‘odd sort of’ postorbital turns out to be not so odd. There is no parietal crest.
Distinct from most of its sisters (Fig. 3) Barberenasuchus has shorter teeth and a larger orbit. The skull is more gracile, and smaller in size. The rostral tip is not reinforced with laminated bone layers, as in Herrerasaurus or a lateral flange of the nasal, as in other basal dinosaurs, so Barberenasuchus is more plesiomorphic and therefore closer to the basalmost dinosaur. By contrast, look at the nasal of Eoraptor (Fig. 3) and Tawa which compares closely to that of Herrerasaurus. So the Barberenasuchus nasal is similar to that of the protodinosaurs while Herrerasaurus is similar to other dinosaurs.
Shifting Barberenasuchus to proximal nodes adds only 3 steps.
Barberenasuchus does not look like any true crocodylomorph (agreeing with Irmis, Nesbitt and Sues, i.e. no anterior leaning quadrate/quadratojugal contacting the postorbital) because it is a basal dinosaur, a small (juvenile?) sister to Herrerasaurus. Barberenasuchus does not have a nasal that extends to the base of the naris, distinct from all other dinosaurs and similar to the protodinosaurs, like Junggarsuchus.
this taxon was not known here when building my ‘Origin of Dinosaurs’ video. It would have been a featured taxon.
deFranca MAG, Bittencourt JdS and Langer MC 2013. Reavaliação taxonomica de Barberenasuchus brasiliensis (Archosauriformes), Ladiniado do Rio Grande do Sul (Zona-Assembleia de Dinodontosaurus). Palaenotogia em Destaque Edição Especial Octubro 2013: 230.
Irmis RB, Nesbitt SJ and Sues H-D 2013. Early Crocodylomorpha. Pp. 275–302 in Nesbitt, Desojo and Irmis (eds). Anatomy, phylogeny and palaeobiology of early archosaurs and their kin. The Geological Society of London. doi:10.1144/SP379.24.
Kischlat EE 2000. Tecodôncios: a aurora dos arcossáurios no Triássico. Pp. 273–316 in Holz and De Ros (eds.). Paleontologia do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: CIGO/UFRGS.
Mattar LCB 1987. Descrição osteólogica do crânio e segunda vértebrata cervical de Barberenasuchus brasiliensis Mattar, 1987 (Reptilia, Thecodontia) do Mesotriássico do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Anais, Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 61: 319–333.
Riff D et al. 2012. Crocodilomorfos: a maior diversidade de répteis fósseis do Brasil. TERRÆ 9: 12-40, 2012.