A week ago I asked readers to tell me: “In figure 1, did I correctly identify two disarticulated prepubes in the pelvic region of Cosesaurus? Or is there a more parsimonious explanation for these identifications?”
The question is important
because certain workers have refused to accept my manuscripts based on their perception that I imagine bones that are not there.
A half-dozen votes came in
(a small percentage of actual visitors). Most saw the shapes and three agreed with the identification. Three could see only some of the shapes and so could not agree with the identification. The results represent such a small sample they are statistically irrelevant.
Thank you for participating.