Basic Problems with “Life History of Rhamphorhynchus Inferred from Bone Histology…”

Today’s paper on Rhamphorhynchus bone histology (Prondvai et al. 2012) reported, “Whereas morphological studies suggested a slow crocodile-like growth strategy and superprecocial volant hatchlings, the only histological study hitherto conducted on Rhamphorhynchus concluded a relatively high growth rate for the genus. These controversial conclusions can be tested by a bone histological survey of an ontogenetic series of Rhamphorhynchus.”

The family tree of the Rhamphorhynchus.

Figure 1. Click to enlarge. The family tree of Rhamphorhynchus in phylogenetic order. Note only the very largest specimen was large enough to produce a hatchling the size of the smallest specimen based on an 8:1 ratio of adult to hatchling as in Pterodaustro and based on egg size/pelvic opening. If so, that means ALL the other Rhamphorhynchus specimens were juveniles despite their many morphological differences. No, this was a clade with a variety of morphologies and sizes, a fact overlooked by the Prondvai et al. (2012) study.

Rhamphorhynchus presents a wide variety of adult sizes with the largest specimens 8x as tall as the smallest (Fig. 1). Unfortunately, the authors gave no indication that the five specimens in their study were from the same single species (of several) within the genus which would have presented an ontogenetic series. This can be determined only by a cladistic analysis of several dozen Rhamphorhynchus specimens, including their five study specimens, but that first step was not done.  Figure 1 demonstrates a phylogenetic series (as determined by cladistic analysis) of the genus Rhamporhynchus. The morphological differences are easy to see. Even the pedal phalanges differ among species (Peters 2009), as noted earlier.

A selection of Rhamphorhynchus feet

Figure 2. A selection of Rhamphorhynchus feet compared to the new one associated with a large fish. Note the morphological differences exhibited by the new specimen, WDC CSG 255 (far right).

 

Furthermore
Substantial morphological change during growth does NOT occur in pterosaurs, as already demonstrated by embryos (especially Pterodaustro). What we’re looking for are tiny versions of the adults already known in the fossil record, and to my knowledge, no juveniles have yet been found that morphologically match 2x to 8x larger adults (the latter being the standard difference between hatchlings and adults as determined by hypothetical egg sizes matched to pelvic openings and the example of Pterodaustro). Ptweety is the only juvenile pterosaur I know of and it also has the proportions of an adult.

What Happens During a Phylogenetic Size Squeeze in Pterosaurs?
“Teens” start having babies. Sexual maturity comes sooner and sooner. Longevity decreases. Adult size decreases. Chinsamy et al. (2008) reported that sexual maturity in Pterodaustro occurred at half the largest size attained. Smaller hips produce smaller eggs. The bone histology of a small specimen with a shorter lifespan mimics the expected histology of a juvenile. Scapulocoracoid fusion likewise disappears during serial phylogenetic size reductions.

Superprecocial Flight
The limiting factor in superprecocial flight still appears to be dermal evaporation and desiccation due to a large surface of volume ratio in tiny pterosaurs. Only those pterosaurs hatching from eggs the size of the three published embryos appear to create a threshold size for flight shortly after hatching. Smaller hatchlings than this had to be terrestrial, hiding in damp leaf litter, rather than taking to the skies, so the lack of flying in hatchling pterosaurs reported by Prondvai et al. (2012) is likely correct, though not for the same reason.

Evidence and support in the form of nexus, pdf and jpeg files will be sent to all who request additional data.

References
Chinsamy A, Codorniú L and Chiappe LM 2008. Developmental growth patterns of the filter-feeder pterosaur, Pterodaustro guinazui. Biology Letters, 4: 282-285.
Prondvai E, Stein K, Ősi A. and Sander MP (2012)
 Life History of Rhamphorhynchus Inferred from Bone Histology and the Diversity of Pterosaurian Growth Strategies.
PLoS ONE 7(2): e31392. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031392
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031392

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.